At eight inches, the Juke’s touchscreen is an inch larger than that of the Yaris Cross. It also has a more modern and intuitive interface. Audiophiles would certainly prefer the punchy 8-speaker Bose premium surround sound system in the Juke over the 6-speaker set up in the Yaris Cross. And that was certainly true of the C4 Cactus, which debuted in 2014 as a bold and striking new crossover to rival the likes of the Nissan Juke and Nissan Qashqai. It’s best known for one cool thing – its ‘airbumps’. Essentially these are moulded plastic sections stuck onto the doors which aim to prevent car park dings. Used Nissan Juke; Used Nissan Qashqai; Used Peugeot 208; Used Range Rover Evoque; Citroen C4 Cactus 1.6 BlueHDi Flair 5dr £0 TAX Ulez Compliant FSH Satnav Bluetooth. Is Citroën C4 Cactus a big car? The Citroen C4 Cactus is a subcompact crossover SUV, which means it is smaller in size compared to midsize and full-size SUVs. However, within the subcompact SUV segment, the C4 Cactus is one of the larger models, with an overall length of around 4.17 meters (13.7 feet) and a width of around 1.71 meters (5.6 feet). Temukan video terbaik tentang Nissan Juke VS C4 Cactus | New Car Review - citroen c4 cactus vs nissan juke , tonton video mobil terbaru, berita industri otomotif di autofun.co.id. Vay Tiền Trả Góp Theo Tháng Chỉ Cần Cmnd Hỗ Trợ Nợ Xấu. The Nissan Juke is the biggest-selling compact crossover in the UK. Buyers can’t seem to get enough of the British-built mini SUV’s unique style and charm. In such a crowded market, however, there are many compelling alternatives. Need something more rugged to cope with occasional off-roading? The Suzuki Vitara should be perfect. After a little more space and class-leading build quality? Try the Skoda Yeti. But what if the Juke isn’t quite distinctive enough? Perhaps the Citroen C4 Cactus might be the car for you? The charming little Citroen has received plenty of praise from critics for its low running costs and easy-going feel from behind the wheel, but how does it compare to the Nissan? Put either the Citroen C4 Cactus or the Nissan Juke in our car configurator to see how much carwow could help you save. Styling On approaching either the Cactus or the Juke, it’s clear that both cars score very highly in the quirkiness stakes – the Cactus for its innovative, original design features and the Juke for its unusual proportions and wacky styling details. Some of the Citroen’s flourishes, such as the roof rails and plastic ‘Airbumps’, serve a practical purpose, too – the former allows roof boxes to be mounted easily, while the latter helps to prevent parking dings from clumsily opened doors. The Juke, meanwhile is covered in sharp creases mixed with curvy lines. At the front, the angular headlights sit above a pair of round spotlights while, at the back, a rakish roofline slopes towards tail lights that mimic the shape of those at the front. Along the sides, large door mirrors (which are great for rear visibility) and exaggerated wheelarches complete the Juke’s SUV-aping look. Both are certain to divide opinion, but it’s hard to deny that few other cars which will attract so much attention for the money… Interior The Citroen’s clever touches continue inside. To reduce complication (and therefore unnecessary weight), the rear windows hinge outwards rather than winding down, while the door pulls are simple fabric straps. A seven-inch touchscreen infotainment system sits atop the dash, and controls functions for the heating, radio and – where equipped – satellite navigation. It’s intuitive to use, and helps keep the dashboard clear of fussy-looking buttons. The Nissan is a little more conventional inside, though the cabin can be livened up with optional brightly coloured trim and seat stitching to match the exterior paint colours. The stylish three-spoke steering wheel and high transmission tunnel help give a cosy, sporty feel from the driver’s seat. Neither car is much larger than a regular supermini, so they’re never going to be the most spacious inside. Both have fairly low rooflines, so rear headroom is tight. The Cactus just edges the Juke for boot volume (at 358 versus 354 litres). If you opt for the Nissan’s four-wheel-drive system, that figure drops dramatically to just 207 litres. Driving On the road, the two cars differ vastly in character. The Cactus is a soft, relaxing car to drive. There is quite a pronounced level of body roll through turns which, combined with slow steering encourages the driver to settle down to a more relaxing pace, at which point the smooth ride can be appreciated even better. By contrast, the Juke features a firm and sporty suspension setup, which allows it to be thrown around corners in a way its raised centre of gravity might not suggest. The steering is sharp and precise, too. It isn’t as comfortable as the Citroen, but it is more fun. The sporty Nismo RS variant features wider tyres and an even firmer set up which helps it deliver prodigious levels of grip. Both models take some flak from testers for their sub-par automatic gearboxes. In terms of manual options, the Juke’s offering is more positive to use than the rather rubbery ‘box in the C4. Engines As you might expect based on each car’s character from behind the wheel, the Juke offers the more potent engine lineup of the two cars, while the Cactus’ range is biased more towards fuel efficiency. The diesel fitted to the Citroen is claimed to return – that’s more than the Juke and its Renault-sourced unit can achieve. Even petrol versions of the Cactus can return These results are due to its very low kerb weight, meaning many of its engines can return significantly better mpg figures while achieving a similar straight line speed to the Nissan. If performance is the top priority though, the Juke is the one to have. Not just if the choice is between Nissan and Citroen, either – the Juke is the most potent mini-crossover on sale. Moderately quick versions of the Juke feature a 190hp turbocharged unit, good for a 0-62mph time of seconds, while the Nismo models are faster still. Sharing a version of the engine fitted to the RenaultSport Clio, the Juke Nismo RS produces 215hp, and will cover the 0-62mph sprint in just seven seconds. Value for money If your budget is the priority, the Citroen is the car to have. The basic petrol is more frugal than the Juke and costs £630 less to buy. The most basic Cactus lacks air conditioning, so it might be worth stretching to the next model up, which gains alloy wheels too. Despite losing out to the Citroen in the value stakes, the Juke is still cheaper to buy than the likes of the Ford EcoSport. Sporty Nismo models are priced marginally higher than traditional hot hatches like the Peugeot 208 GTI. Verdict Both the Citroen C4 Cactus and the Nissan Juke are distinctive choices in their own right. Both take very different approaches, and the one you prefer will probably come down to personal taste. If you’re keen on a sharp, sporty SUV-styled Ford Fiesta alternative, the Juke is the car to go for. If, however, you prefer your next car to feel a little more relaxing, the Cactus is the better option. On balance, however, the Citroen’s superior value for money and low running costs should make it the more suitable choice for most buyers. Save money on your Citroen C4 Cactus or Nissan Juke Put either the Citroen C4 Cactus or the Nissan Juke in our car configurator to see how much carwow could help you save. For more options, head over to our deals page or, if you’re still searching for your ideal next car, check out our car chooser. Skip to ContentSkip to FooterWe put crucial new Ford EcoSport crossover through its paces against bold new Citroen and big-selling Nissan13 Aug 2014Traditionally, small family cars are all cut from a similar cloth and follow the small hatchback template. But with the spectacular rise in the popularity of SUVs has come a much broader range of styles, shapes and characters to choose from. Which is why the three contenders we’ve gathered here all fit loosely into the supermini SUV category, but go about their business in very different is our first chance to drive the Ford EcoSport on UK roads, and since it’s based on Britain’s best-selling car and our Supermini of the Year – the Ford Fiesta – it’s a mouth-watering proposition. If it can carry over even some of the Fiesta’s playful handling, while boosting practicality and visibility, Ford is on to another winner. However, the EcoSport’s route to UK roads has been a unusual was originally designed in Brazil with emerging markets in mind. We drove a South American versionaround Sao Paulo way back in 2012 and have been waiting patiently ever since. UK cars are builtin India and tweaked for European tastes with higher specification and new powertrains, including a TDCi diesel and the award-winning EcoBoost three-cylinder petrol driven here. But has Ford done enough to disguise the car’s cut-price roots?The Citroen C4 Cactus takes a more relaxed approach, majoring on comfort, ease of use and distinctive design. It’s a technique that’s served Citroen well in the past and, with first deliveries next month, looks set to strike a chord with customers tired of makers harping on about sporty handling, when all they want is something to tackle everyday trips with the minimum of again, sporty handling and brash styling have served the hugely successful Nissan Juke well since it invented the class in 2010. The Juke has recently been reinvigorated with a fresh look and a new DIG-T turbo engine, but has it still got the game to see off this pair of pretenders?StylingWhile its two main rivals have a look all of their own, the EcoSport is more of a Fiesta on stilts, so the proportions are less successful. View it from the front, and Ford’s globally recognised wide-mouthed grille and slim headlights look smart, but from the rear the horrendous spare wheel stuck to the tailgate undoes all the good work with more than a whiffof late eighties Suzuki reviews The interior design will be instantly familiar to Fiesta owners, too, with the same confusing array of buttons strewn across the centre console and a dated LCD screen set deep into the dash. The overall look is angular and modern, but start scratching, poking and squeezing the trim materials and it feels much cheaper than a the Juke next to the EcoSport, and the Nissan looks as if it’s been beamed down from another planet. The mid-life changes are limited to tweaked headlights, a new lower front grille and redesigned rear bumper, but the Juke was so radical four years ago, it still looks fresh now. It’s a similar story inside where the shiny-coloured inserts and motorbike-inspired centre console are hardly subtle, but reflect the sporty way the Juke the line between them is the C4 Cactus, which combines quirky flourishes like the Airbump panels and two-piece headlights with minimalist surfaces and perfect proportions. The result could have been a mess, but by being bold Citroen designed something that’s cool and contemporary without being overly if the outside appeals, then the uncluttered interior should, too, from its flat, wide and squidgy front seats to its stripped-back dash, consisting of a central screen and a digital instrument cluster. You sit lower than in the other cars – the C4 Cactus is based on the C3 platform, but has similar dimensions to a C4, with slightly more ground clearance – and Citroen has made the most of limited resources, placing soft-touch materials on the most prominent surfaces and cheaper stuff lower the EcoSport should excel in one area, it’s from behind the wheel, and there are clear echoes of the Fiesta. The steering is immediate and direct, while the gearshift has a notchy, mechanical in corners the centre of gravity feels significantly higher as the car tips from side to side. A glance at the spec sheet reveals why – at 1,350kg, this car weighs 259kg more than the Fiesta EcoBoost. So while the 123bhp three- cylinder fizzes away under the bonnet of the Fiesta, here it feels laboured and flat. It still maintains its smoothness and refinement at high revs, but getting up to speed is hard work. Once you’re there the ride quality is good, thanks to the extra suspension travel, but in the transition from supermini to SUV the Fiesta’s spark has been big surprise is how much faster the C4 Cactus feels than its rivals here. With only 1,020kg to haul around (about 200kg less than an equivalent C4 hatch), it shoots forward once the turbo spools things easy, slide the gearstick slowly through its ratios and there’s enough torque for gliding around in higher gears, enjoying the spongy suspension and the peace and quiet in the cabin. If you are in a hurry, though, the Cactus is capable – you’ll just need to be patient, while it leans on its outside springs in corners, before shooting off down the next straight. By contrast, the Juke feels firmer, with meatier steering. Although the ride is never uncomfortable, you feel more bumps than in the other cars – the pay-off is a bit of fun when the road opens a kerbweight of 1,236kg, the Juke doesn’t have quite the pace of the Cactus off the line, but in-gear acceleration from the new DIG-T punches well above its cubic terms of interior space, the EcoSport is hard to argue against. With the split fold rear seats in place there’s a 310-litre boot (the smallest here), but drop them and it offers 1,238 litres (the most here). Rear leg and headroom is top of the pile, too, while the raised driving position is more SUV-like than the Citroen’ spend some time in the Ford and problems begin to emerge, such as thick A-pillars that hamper front visibility and the fact the load area isn’t flat with the seats down. By far the biggest annoyance, though, is the side-hinged tailgate: while it creates a nice low loading lip, it means you’ll need to leave a good five feet of space behind you when you park to open it – not ideal in congested town Juke can’t swallow the same amount of luggage (its 354-litre boot grows to 1,189 litres), but its packaging is better thought through. A false floor lets you decide between a perfectly level loading lip and a flat load area in its higher position, or maximum space for your bags when you lower it. Large adults won’t want to spend prolonged periods in the back, though, as the sloping roofline eats into Citroen started with the C3 supermini, the amount of luggage space it’s squeezed out of the Cactus is impressive. With the back seats in place, the 358-litre boot is the biggest here; fold them and it grows to 1,170 it’s not all good news. To cut costs and weight, a split-fold rear bench is optional, while the pop-out rear windows might be too claustrophobic for some. Still, we like the fact Citroen has made a virtue of those rear windows by installing huge door bins in the rear, while leg and headroom is on a par with the Juke’ costsIf running costs are a priority, all three cars offer a more efficient diesel engine option. But plumping for petrol isn’t the compromise it once was, plus you save on the price (the petrol EcoSport is £500 cheaper). The EcoBoost’s economy and 125g/km emissions aren’t bad on paper (especially as the Juke claims and 126g/km), but you’ll have to put up with a frustratingly slow 0-62mph time of the Cactus perfectly demonstrates the benefit of lightweight engineering. Weighing 216kg less than its closest rival here, it claims and 107g/km, but is over a second faster from 0-62mph than the EcoSport is the cheapest car in this test, and only comes in Titanium spec. But while you get 16-inch alloy wheels, LED running lights and a cooled glovebox as standard, our test model’s Kinetic Blue metallic paint costs extra, as do rear parking mid-spec Juke costs around £500 more, yet it gets a screen with sat-nav, plus three driving modes and 17-inch wheels. Our top-spec C4 Cactus Flair is another £500 still, but has all the kit you could need, including sat-nav, a rear parking camera and a seven-inch touchscreen. By comparison the Ford’s kit list – and the whole package, for that matter – feels a generation which would we choose?It’s possible to make a case for any one of these cars, depending on where your priorities lie. The EcoSport has the most space inside, the Juke is infused with a sense of fun the other two can’t match and the C4 Cactus is the easiest to live look beyond the EcoSport’s practicality and it falls woefully short. Build quality is fine for emerging markets, but not good enough for European tastes, and the Fiesta’s superb handling has been blunted by the extra it’s sharp handling you want, the Juke is top of the pile, and the lively turbo engine gets the best out of the chassis, although the striking body shape compromises interior space. As for the Cactus, it manages to mix desirability, space, efficiency and performance in a package that charms all who drive it – which is why it takes how about the Mokka?The Vauxhall Mokka fits neatly into this company on the face of it, although we decided to leave it out of our test for a number of actually a little larger than our trio, at 4,278mm long, plus it offers maximum boot space of 1,372 litres – so it sits somewhere between the Nissan Juke and its Qashqai big brother. The Mokka is more pricey, too, with even the entry-level 113bhp Exclusiv petrol costing £18, there are some cracking offers out there that help to make the Mokka almost as affordable as the EcoSport, C4 Cactus and StepsMost PopularToyota bZ4X vs Volkswagen vs Hyundai Ioniq 5: 2022 group test reviewCar group testsToyota bZ4X vs Volkswagen vs Hyundai Ioniq 5: 2022 group test reviewDoes Toyota’s all-new bZ4X electric SUV crack the family-friendly formula? We compare it to Hyundai and VW rivals23 Jul 2022Hyundai plots electric city car for under £20kNewsHyundai plots electric city car for under £20kHyundai is looking to expand its EV line-up with an affordable compact model to rival electric city cars from the Volkswagen Group22 Jul 2022Best electric cars to buy 2022Best cars & vansBest electric cars to buy 2022There are more electric cars than ever to choose from, so we've picked some of the best you can buy in the UK now6 Jul 2022Skip to HeaderSkip to Content Bringing car spotting into perspective Real height1 m 2 + 8 cm 1 m Real height1 + cm 1 m Real length Click/tap cars to swap positions Street perspective vs. specification. See Disclaimer. Side ViewCitroën C4 Cactus (E3) SUV 2014 vs. Nissan Juke (F15) SUV 2010 Technical specs | Citroën C4 Cactus (E3) SUV 2014 is cm longer and 8 cm lower compared to Nissan Juke (F15) SUV 2010. It offers 41% more cargo 1. Maximum height | 2. Width with folded mirrors | 3. Max. ground clearance | 4. Most common power unit. Possible deviation of standards. | 5. With rear seats folded down Quick Facts 719400 Comparison combinations Germany Origin of the most car models 1908 Year of our oldest car model Compare two cars 2010. - 2014. J - SUV suv, 5 door front Badges Production Vehicle class Body style Wheel drive Safety 2012. - 2017. J - SUV suv, 5 door front Dimensons & Outlines Length Width Height Boot (min) Boot (max) Fuel tank 2010 Nissan Juke 2012 Citroen C4 Aircross © GAMA1 Solutions. Copying & distribution prohibited. Engine Petrol 4 - Inline, 4 valves per cylinder Nat. Asp. Engine Fuel Configuration Aspiration Displacement Power Torque Petrol 4 - Inline, 4 valves per cylinder Nat. Asp. Performance (manual gearbox) Gearbox type Vehicle weight Acc. 0-100 Top speed Cons. (urban) Cons. (highway) Cons. (average) CO2 emissions Performance (automatic gearbox) Gearbox type Vehicle weight Acc. 0-100 Top speed Cons. (urban) Cons. (highway) Cons. (average) CO2 emissions Expenses Virtual Adviser's™ opinion Overview Well, these are two pretty similar cars we have here! It's only details that could potentially make the difference. Considering they both belong to the suv segment and utilize the same 5-door suv body style and the front wheel drive system, it all comes up to the specific petrol engine choice they offer. The first one has a Nissan-engineered powertrain under the hood, a 4-cylinder, 16-valves 117hp unit, while the other one gets its power and torque from a 4-cylinder, 16-valves 117hp engine designed by Mitsubishi. Safety The fact that the Nissan got tested by the European New Car Assessment Programme (Euro NCAP), while the other contender didn't, puts it sky-high safety-wise, in my eyes at least. Moving further on, let's take a closer look at some additional safety-related facts. Both vehicles belong to the suv segment, which is generally a very good thing safety-wise, but that fact doesn't break the tie between the two cars. On the other hand, when it comes to weight, a factor that most people underestimate, the French car offers a marginal difference of 9% more metal. Reliability Manufacturers have been building their reliability reputation for decades now and, generally speaking, it appears that Nissan does have a slight advantage, all the models observed together. These are the results of an independent reasearch, while our visitors describe reliability of Nissan, as well as Citroen, with the same average rating of out of 5. Independent research findings rank Juke as average reliability-wise, and C4 Aircross is more or less at the same apart, owners of different cars powered by the same engine as the Japanese car rank it on average as out of 5, exactly the same as the other one. Performance & Fuel economy Nissan is a bit more agile, reaching 100km/h in seconds less than its competitor. Still, it lacks the power to win the top speed competition, topping at 178 kilometers per hour, 5km/h less than the other car. When it comes to fuel economy things look pretty much the same for both cars, averaging around liters of fuel per 100 kilometers (48 mpg), in combined cycle. Verdict Nissan appears just a bit more reliable, although the difference is truly marginal. The most important thing when deciding between any two vehicles should always be safety, both passive and active. In my opinion, everything taken into account, the Japanese car beats the other contender by far, making it the best choice without even considering other things. It all continues in the same direction, with Nissan offering somewhat better performance, just enough to call it quicker. To make things even better, it consumps less fuel! All together, there's not much more to say, in this case I wouldn't even consider anything but Nissan. Nevertheless, let's not forget that people have different preferences and needs, so what really counts is your personal feel. I'm only here to help. In case you have two minutes to spare I invite you to define your needs, desires and budget and see which car would be chosen by the virtual adviser™, out of vehicles we currently have in our database. Check a car by its VIN number Our Cars: Citroen C4 Cactus 13 June 2016: What are the alternatives? The Details Current miles 3261 Claimed economy Actual economy With its stand out looks, spacious cabin and sensible pricing, the C4 Cactus has a nice niche to itself, appealing to buyers who aren’t quite committed to a crossover. But there are alternatives that offer similar space for roughly the same price – here’s a rundown of some Cactus rivals. Dacia Duster If you’re on a tight budget then the Duster will hold plenty of appeal, since it’s priced from just £9495. However, unlike the Cactus - which manages to be charming despite its fairly low price - the Duster feels a bit like a fridge or a washing machine. It’s like a white good, built for a purpose. It’s practical though, with a decent boot and a good amount of passenger space in the back row. The engine range isn’t great, the plastics feel cheap and everything looks like it has been lifted from 1999 – but if you need a cheap price tag over all else then it’s ideal. Nissan Juke If unusual looks matter more than practicality, then the Juke is possibly the best alternative to the Cactus. The back seats are tight and the boot is small, but it’s fun to drive, costs roughly the same as the Cactus and has unique styling. It might be ubiquitous these days, but despite having been on sale for years it still looks striking. There’s even a high performance version of the Cactus engine range leaves you yearning for more punch – but it’s not the best performance car around. That said, the turbocharged petrol fits the Juke’s character well and it’s reasonably economical too. Peugeot 2008 The 2008 is available with some of the engines Citroen fits to the Cactus, but with more traditional crossover styling. It’s an easy car to drive and it’s practical, but it lacks the characterful styling of the Cactus and it doesn’t represent the same value for money. It’s still a good choice of crossover though, particularly since it was revised recently. If you want an automatic gearbox then the 2008 is a better choice than the Cactus because it’s EAT6 transmissions is far smoother than the jerky automated manual used by Citroen. Renault Captur Another crossover, this time a little smaller than the 2008. The Captur is good to drive and is available with very affordable finance packages. One thing that sets the Captur apart from rivals is how well-reviewed it is by owners on One owner, having covered 100,000 miles in her Captur, has ordered another one to replace it since she has got on so well with it. It’s easy to drive, but prices are slightly higher than in the Cactus and it isn’t quite as practical nor as nicely finished inside. « Earlier: How affordable is the Cactus? Later: Bon Voyage, Cactus » Updates It’s time to say farewell to our vibrant, bubble-wrapped Citroen after six months of largely trouble-free driving. 13 June 2016: What are the alternatives? The C4 Cactus has a nice niche to itself, appealing to buyers who aren’t quite committed to a crossover. But there are alternatives... We look at some of the ways you can end up driving a new Cactus, including SimplyDrive. The 110PS petrol in our Cactus is a great fit - but there are other options, including an economical diesel. The C4 Cactus has a big touchscreen that controls pretty much everything – but is this progress? Citroen's old Mehari beach buggy has inspired a new Cactus-based concept, which may make production. A few longer journeys show up some weaknesses with the Cactus – but also some strengths. John goes over the Cactus with a fine tooth comb to find the areas where Citroen has shaved off cost and weight. Those black bits adorning the C4 Cactus aren’t just for show – they’re like automotive bubble wrap. In Watch Mark Nichol's video on the Cactus, covering 10 things you need to know about the fun French family car. It looks quirky and unusual, like Citroens of old - but does the C4 Cactus drive as well as some of its ancestors? We have a bright blue new arrival, which promises to be the most vibrant and most interesting car in the Honest John fleet for the next six months

citroen c4 cactus vs nissan juke